View Member's Blog Listing
Bio:
|
eric3579 ![]() Member Profile Member Since: 2007-01-22 Charter Subdomain: http://eric3579.videosift.com Last Power Points used: 2011-07-12 • Available: now Max Power Points: 2 • Get More Power Points Now Comments | Achievements Navigation
Member Stats Rank: 8 Rating:
925 star points#1 Videos: 62 Top 15 Videos: 239 Votes Received: 50876 Average Votes Per Video: 57.42 Votes Cast: 14390 Comments Posted: 10300 • browse Comments Applauded: 37 Sifted Videos: 886 Sift Talk Posts: 54 Quality Sift Talk Posts: 22 Poll Posts: 1 Blog Entries: 33 • browse Dead Pool Fixes: 200 Public Playlists: 7 • browse Profile Views: 94240 Latest Blog Entries by eric3579
Highest Ranked Comments Member's Highest Rated Videos 2. White and Nerdy - Weird Al Yankovic (2:51) 3. Daft Punk - Gets a hand job (3:44) 4. Amazing Rhythmic Gymnast Skills (1:36) |
In reply to this comment by eric3579:
http://videosift.com/video/Rat-Versus-4-Cats
In reply to this comment by eric3579:
Thanks my brotha!
In reply to this comment by Barseps:
Once again, you beat me to it on this one :
^Upvoted^
*Love
*Electronica
*Doublepromote
In reply to this comment by eric3579:
That was just crazy
FIVE YEARS!
What would the sift be without you?
You are a quality dude. Dude.
In reply to this comment by eric3579:
Watch full screen and in HD
In reply to this comment by eric3579:
*promote
In reply to this comment by eric3579:
*promote
On the other, I think it's largely spun in a self-serving way from a right-wing ideologue. His big complaint is that the parties are too similar, but then largely misidentifies this as somehow inherently a liberal confluence of policy, when the real issue is that we haven't had a liberal shift in America's policies since before I was born.
A lot of the problem, IMO, is that conservatives like to sell people on the idea of "divided government" and the whole idea that adding opportunities for the minority to stop things from happening (like the filibuster) are the essence of "limited" government.
They've been on a decades-long crusade to stop or sabotage the government from acting effectively on any topic, and now they're complaining that their success means they were right that the government is some unresponsive, ineffectual, cold-hearted leviathan that must be destroyed...even though they had a lot to do with it getting that way, and have worked tirelessly to keep it that way, regardless of whether people vote for them or not.
I don't really know how we're going to get out of this situation, but the solution has got to start with people getting fed up with this blame-shifting excuse coming from the right. Government is not some alien creature acting on its own whims, it's a human institution, populated with human beings, acting in accordance to laws that are voted into existence by people.
People who think "government" is the problem, are letting the actual people responsible for the problem off the hook, because they're too apathetic to figure out who's really to blame. And assholes like Judge Napolitano want to help encourage them to keep blaming "the government" by trying to make it seem like it's some all-encompassing conspiracy that no mere mortal could penetrate, rather than it being the direct result of decades of Republican malfeasance left unchecked by anyone, including Democrats.
And forgive the rant, especially if you're not normally into politics.
In reply to this comment by eric3579:
http://videosift.com/video/Unprecedented-wisdom-coming-out-of-Fox
I dont do politics but this got to me a bit fired up. I know this is something you might be interested in and was curious what you and @<a rel="nofollow" href="http://netrunner.videosift.com" title="member since August 5th, 2006" class="profilelink"><strong style="color:#0000CD">NetRunner thought.
1. At the end of a rant against republicans and democrats, he endorses a republican.
2. He gives a list of politicians who have failed to live up to their campaign promises, and then endorses Ron Paul, without considering that he too would also fail to live up to his campaign promises, because he would be subject to the same political realities (congress, the media, big money, etc. all have power to subvert the president) that all of the previous presidents had to face.
I don't believe Ron Paul to be the saint he's made out to be. He's another rich, conservative, white career politician pushing his own questionable agenda on a whole lot of unsuspecting citizens.
More reading:
http://www.geekarmy.com/geekblog/politics/transcript-of-noam-chomsky-on-ron-paul/
http://videosift.com/video/Why-so-many-people-are-endorsing-Ron-Paul-for-President?loadcomm=1#comment-1380333
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/01/13/1054389/-Of-Broken-Clocks,-Presidential-Candidates-and-the-Confusion-of-Certain-White-Liberals
In reply to this comment by eric3579:
http://videosift.com/video/Unprecedented-wisdom-coming-out-of-Fox
I dont do politics but this got to me a bit fired up. I know this is something you might be interested in and was curious what you and @<a rel="nofollow" href="http://netrunner.videosift.com" title="member since August 5th, 2006" class="profilelink"><strong style="color:#0000CD">NetRunner thought.
In reply to this comment by eric3579:
*promote
Although I saw a headline -- the boycott, right?
What is funny is my uber conservative nephew -- his daughter is selling Girl Scout cookies for the first time this year. I was buying some any way but now there is double pleasure in it!
In reply to this comment by eric3579:
I'm buying more girl scout cookies this year. My way of giving this type of thinking a big FU!
http://youtu.be/Y514LSe8FWk